What "Google Drive delivery" actually looks like

The standard Tamil Nadu studio Google Drive workflow:

It's free, but it isn't free.

Side-by-side

Google DriveWed.ing
Per-guest gallery (only their photos)No — everyone sees everythingYes — AI face matching
Studio branding visible to guestsNo — Google branding onlyYes — fully white-label
WhatsApp delivery to guestsManual — share link per groupAutomatic — per-guest link
Album selection from guestsNo — manual screenshotsYes — tap-to-favourite
Storage cost (50 GB / month)~₹130/month (Drive Basic)Bundled in plan
Old-relative friendlinessDrive app neededJust WhatsApp
Guest privacy (each sees only their photos)No — entire album sharedYes
Search photos by faceNoYes (AI)
Lead generation for your studioNoneStudio CTA on every gallery

Why Google Drive feels free but costs you bookings

The hidden cost of Google Drive isn't storage — it's the bookings you don't get because none of those guests know who shot the wedding. They saw 3,000 photos in a Google folder. They couldn't find their own photos. They closed the tab.

Wed.ing puts your studio name and contact CTA on every guest's gallery. That same wedding becomes 250 personalised galleries with your brand on each one. Some of those guests are planning their own weddings in 18 months.

What Google Drive still does better

If you only deliver to immediate family (5 people max) and you don't care about marketing, Google Drive is fine. If you have 50+ guests and you sell weddings for a living, you need a delivery layer that markets you.

The hybrid approach

Some studios use Wed.ing for guest delivery (WhatsApp, branded, AI-matched) and a Google Drive folder shared only with the couple for the full RAW/JPEG archive. That works well. The two solve different problems.

→ Wed.ing vs Pen Drive   ·   → Wed.ing vs Pixieset

Try Wed.ing on your next wedding

Free first event. Keep your Drive folder for the couple's archive — let Wed.ing handle every guest.